Targeting WordPress users by role is useful whenever an action, message, interface or security rule should apply to one group of users without affecting everyone else on the site.
An Administrator may need to see a server warning that would be meaningless to a Subscriber. Editors may need access to an editorial announcement that customers should never receive. A two-factor authentication policy may initially apply only to privileged accounts. A post-login redirect may send customers to an account area while administrators continue directly to the WordPress dashboard.
WordPress roles provide a convenient way to describe these groups, but role targeting needs to be implemented carefully. Roles and capabilities are related but different concepts, users can have more than one role in some configurations, multisite adds another layer and checking a role directly is not always the best way to make an authorization decision.
This guide explains how WordPress roles work in user targeting, how to retrieve users belonging to one or more roles, when to target capabilities instead, how multiple-role systems affect matching and how role-based targeting can be applied to notifications, login behavior, security requirements and backend interfaces.
What is a WordPress user role?
A WordPress role is a named collection of capabilities.
A standard WordPress installation includes roles such as:
- Administrator;
- Editor;
- Author;
- Contributor;
- Subscriber.
Each role represents a different general level of access.
For example, an Editor can normally manage and publish content created by other users, while a Subscriber has far fewer administrative capabilities.
The official WordPress Roles and Capabilities documentation explains the default roles and the capabilities assigned to them.
For the broader architecture behind this system, see WordPress user roles and capabilities, explained.
Roles and capabilities are not the same thing
This distinction is essential.
A role is:
Administrator
Editor
Author
Subscriber
A capability is a specific permission such as:
edit_posts
publish_posts
manage_options
edit_users
upload_files
A role normally provides several capabilities.
Conceptually:
Editor
├── edit_posts
├── edit_others_posts
├── publish_posts
├── delete_posts
└── upload_files
The exact capability set depends on WordPress configuration and any plugins that modify the role system.
Target by role when membership in the group matters
Role targeting is useful when the requirement is genuinely:
Send this to Editors.
or:
Apply this setting to Subscribers.
Examples include:
- sending an editorial announcement to Editors;
- showing onboarding information to Subscribers;
- redirecting customers after login;
- requiring 2FA for Administrators;
- hiding technical admin notices from Authors;
- showing a dashboard widget only to a particular team.
Target by capability when permission is what really matters
Suppose the requirement is:
Show this tool to anyone who can edit users.
Checking:
Administrator
may work on a simple site, but it assumes Administrators are the only users who could ever have that permission.
A custom role could also have:
edit_users
If permission is what matters, checking the capability is usually more robust.
WordPress provides current_user_can() for capability checks involving the current user.
A simple rule: groups use roles, permissions use capabilities
This is a useful mental model:
"Editors should receive this announcement."
→ Role
"Anyone allowed to manage options may use this feature."
→ Capability
The distinction prevents role names from becoming a substitute for actual authorization logic.
Do not use role checks as your only security mechanism
Consider:
if ( user is Administrator ) {
allow database operation
}
The actual security requirement may be:
User must have the capability required
to perform this administrative action.
Capabilities are the WordPress authorization abstraction designed for this purpose.
Role targeting remains useful for audience segmentation and workflow behavior, but sensitive actions should generally be protected using appropriate capabilities.
How WordPress exposes a user’s roles
A WordPress user can be represented through a WP_User object.
For example:
$user = get_userdata( $user_id );
The object includes a:
$user->roles
property containing the user’s assigned role slugs.
A typical result could be:
[
'editor'
]
The official WP_User documentation describes the WordPress user object.
Role slugs are not display labels
The visible role might be:
Shop Manager
while the internal slug is:
shop_manager
Code should generally work with the role slug.
Do not compare localized human-readable labels when the actual role identifier is available.
Checking whether a specific user has a role
A direct membership test could look like:
$user = get_userdata( $user_id );
if (
$user &&
in_array(
'editor',
(array) $user->roles,
true
)
) {
// User belongs to the Editor role.
}
This can be appropriate for audience segmentation.
Again, do not automatically use this pattern in place of capability checks for privileged operations.
How to get all users with a particular role
WordPress provides:
get_users()
for retrieving users matching specific criteria.
For example:
$editors = get_users(
[
'role' => 'editor',
]
);
The official get_users() documentation explains that the function uses the same query arguments provided by WP_User_Query.
WP_User_Query provides the underlying query system
For more control, WordPress provides:
WP_User_Query
For example:
$query = new WP_User_Query(
[
'role' => 'editor',
]
);
$editors = $query->get_results();
The official WP_User_Query documentation describes user filtering by role, capability, metadata and other account properties.
You can query several roles
WordPress provides role-related query arguments including:
role
role__in
role__not_in
For example:
$users = get_users(
[
'role__in' => [
'administrator',
'editor',
],
]
);
This retrieves users matching at least one of the listed roles.
role and role__in have different semantics
Be careful when combining role criteria.
The role parameter can accept role names that users must satisfy according to the query’s matching rules, while:
role__in
is designed for OR-style matching across several roles.
If the intention is:
Administrator OR Editor
role__in communicates that intention clearly.
You can exclude roles too
For example:
$users = get_users(
[
'role__not_in' => [
'subscriber',
],
]
);
This can be useful when a message or administrative operation should apply broadly but exclude one or more user groups.
Do not fetch every user if you only need IDs
Suppose you need recipient IDs for a notification queue.
Instead of retrieving full user objects:
$users = get_users(
[
'role' => 'editor',
]
);
you can request only IDs:
$user_ids = get_users(
[
'role' => 'editor',
'fields' => 'ID',
]
);
This reduces the amount of unnecessary user data returned by the query.
Large user bases need pagination
A site with:
40 users
can reasonably retrieve a role group in one operation.
A site with:
400,000 users
should not casually load every matching WP_User object into memory because someone wrote:
'number' => -1
five minutes before lunch.
Use batching and pagination for large operations.
WP_User_Query supports pagination
Useful arguments include:
number
offset
paged
A batch-oriented process might retrieve:
500 users at a time
instead of attempting to process the entire audience in one request.
Targeting users by capability
WP_User_Query also supports capability-related arguments such as:
capability
capability__in
capability__not_in
For example:
$users = get_users(
[
'capability' => 'edit_users',
]
);
or:
$users = get_users(
[
'capability__in' => [
'edit_pages',
'edit_posts',
],
]
);
This can be more appropriate when the required audience is defined by what users are permitted to do rather than by their role name.
Capability queries have limitations
WordPress’s official WP_User_Query documentation notes that capability queries operate on capabilities represented in the stored role and user capability data.
They do not necessarily reproduce every dynamic authorization result produced through:
map_meta_cap
or other runtime filters.
That means:
Query users who appear to have capability X
and:
Ask whether this specific user can perform
this specific operation right now
are not always identical operations.
current_user_can() remains the right tool for current-user authorization
For example:
if (
current_user_can(
'manage_options'
)
) {
// Allow privileged interface.
}
is generally preferable to:
if (
in_array(
'administrator',
wp_get_current_user()->roles,
true
)
) {
// Allow privileged interface.
}
The first asks the real question:
Can this user do this?
The second asks:
Does this user have a role we currently
associate with doing this?
Roles are excellent for communications
Notifications are one of the clearest cases where role targeting makes sense.
Suppose a website needs to announce:
The editorial workflow changes on Monday.
Recipients might be:
Editors
Authors
Subscribers do not need that message.
Administrators may or may not need it depending on the organization.
For writing the message itself, see Writing effective in-app notification copy.
TheOneWP Notifications Generator supports role targeting
TheOneWP Notifications Generator can target in-app notifications to:
- all users;
- specific roles;
- individual accounts.
This is more useful than sending every announcement to every WordPress account merely because they all happen to exist in the same database.
Notifications Off-Canvas provides the delivery interface
Notifications Off-Canvas provides the interface used to display persistent in-app notifications.
Combined with role targeting, this allows messages such as:
Editors:
New editorial policy
Administrators:
Scheduled server migration
Subscribers:
New account feature
to remain relevant to the people receiving them.
Role targeting improves notification copy too
A narrower audience lets the message assume appropriate context.
For example, Administrators may understand:
Object caching will be disabled during
the Redis migration at 22:00.
A broader user audience might need:
The dashboard may be slower between
22:00 and 22:30 during server maintenance.
Better targeting reduces the need to write one vague message for everyone.
In-app notifications and email serve different role-targeting needs
If the message only matters while someone is actively using WordPress, an in-app notification may be appropriate.
If the recipient must receive the information whether they log in or not, email may be more suitable.
See In-app notifications vs. email for WordPress for the full comparison.
Role targeting can control admin notices too
WordPress dashboards often show technical notices that are useful to administrators but irrelevant to lower-privilege users.
For example:
PHP version warning
Plugin configuration warning
Database maintenance notice
Server environment notice
An Author usually cannot act on these messages anyway.
TheOneWP Disable Admin Notifications by Role allows normal WordPress admin notices to be hidden for selected roles.
For the underlying notice system, see WordPress admin notices, explained.
Hiding irrelevant information is sometimes better than rewriting it
Suppose an Author sees:
Your database engine requires optimization.
You could rewrite it into simpler language.
Or you could acknowledge that the Author cannot modify the database and should probably never see it.
Audience targeting is part of interface design.
Role targeting can control post-login destinations
Different account types often need different landing pages after authentication.
For example:
Administrator
→ /wp-admin/
Editor
→ /wp-admin/edit.php
Customer
→ /my-account/
Member
→ /dashboard/
TheOneWP Redirect After Login provides role-based redirect rules for this type of workflow.
Role-based login redirects should resolve conflicts predictably
If users can have several roles, this becomes important.
Suppose:
User roles:
editor
shop_manager
and both roles have different redirect destinations.
The system needs an explicit rule for deciding which destination wins.
Possible strategies include:
- role priority;
- first matching configured rule;
- primary-role precedence;
- explicit per-user override.
What matters is that the behavior is deterministic.
WordPress core normally assigns one role through ordinary administration
Standard WordPress administration generally treats one role as the normal assignment for a user.
However, the underlying WordPress capability system can represent several roles for one account, and plugins can build user interfaces around that capability.
Multiple roles complicate audience targeting
Consider:
User:
Jessica
Roles:
Editor
SEO Manager
If a message targets:
SEO Manager
should Jessica receive it?
Usually yes, even if Editor is considered the account’s primary administrative role.
A targeting system that only checks one role can miss legitimate recipients.
TheOneWP Multi Role Assignment adds explicit extra roles
TheOneWP Multi Role Assignment allows additional roles to be assigned to an account while combining the capabilities provided by those roles.
This makes role matching relevant to modules such as:
- notifications;
- security rules;
- login alerts;
- administrative interface behavior.
Do not assume $user->roles[0] tells the whole story
Code such as:
$role = $user->roles[0];
implicitly assumes there is one meaningful role.
If the application supports multiple roles, check the complete role set instead.
For example:
$matches = array_intersect(
$target_roles,
(array) $user->roles
);
if ( ! empty( $matches ) ) {
// User matches at least one target role.
}
Role Manager lets you define custom audiences
TheOneWP Role Manager can create and edit WordPress roles and their capabilities.
This means a website does not have to organize every workflow around only the default:
Administrator
Editor
Author
Contributor
Subscriber
A site might instead introduce:
SEO Manager
Support Agent
Project Manager
Content Reviewer
Store Assistant
These become much more useful targeting groups when they reflect actual organizational responsibilities.
Do not create a role only because you need one notification audience
A role is fundamentally part of the authorization system.
If you merely need:
Users interested in marketing announcements
that may be better represented through:
- user meta;
- a preference;
- a mailing-list group;
- a custom segmentation field.
Creating a fake security role solely to act as a newsletter tag muddies the permission model.
User meta can represent audience attributes that are not roles
For example:
department = marketing
account_plan = agency
onboarding_complete = false
notification_group = beta_testers
These values may belong in user metadata rather than WordPress roles.
For the metadata layer, see WordPress user meta, explained.
Use roles for authorization-oriented identity
A useful separation is:
Role:
What kind of WordPress operator is this?
User meta:
What additional properties describe this account?
For example:
Role:
editor
Meta:
department = marketing
You can then target:
all Editors
or build a narrower custom audience:
Editors in Marketing
if the application requires it.
Role targeting is useful for security policies
High-privilege accounts often deserve stricter controls.
For example:
Administrators
→ Require 2FA
Editors
→ Optional 2FA
Subscribers
→ No requirement
TheOneWP Two-Factor Authentication can apply two-factor requirements to selected roles.
Roll security policies out by privilege
A practical security rollout may start with:
Administrator
then expand to:
Editor
Shop Manager
Other privileged custom roles
This allows the process to be tested on smaller groups before applying it to every account.
Role name alone does not tell you the true security risk
A custom role called:
Content Helper
could theoretically have:
manage_options
install_plugins
edit_users
if someone configured it badly.
For security-sensitive decisions, inspect capabilities rather than trusting reassuring role labels.
Target login monitoring by role
Administrators may want immediate alerts when privileged accounts authenticate.
For example:
Administrator logged in
→ send alert
Subscriber logged in
→ no alert
This reduces noise while preserving visibility around high-value accounts.
Role targeting can control admin navigation
Different teams may need different WordPress admin menus.
For example:
Editors:
Posts
Media
Comments
SEO team:
Posts
SEO
Redirects
Administrators:
Everything
Role-aware administration can reduce clutter and accidental interaction with tools users do not need.
For the broader dashboard cleanup problem, see Decluttering the WordPress admin dashboard.
Hiding an interface is not the same as denying access
This is critical.
Removing a menu item for Subscribers does not secure the underlying page if the page itself fails to check authorization.
Security requires:
Capability check on protected operation
not merely:
Menu item is invisible.
The same applies to frontend interfaces
Suppose you hide a frontend control from non-Administrators using CSS:
display: none;
That is presentation logic.
It does not protect the server-side action behind the button.
The server must still verify whether the authenticated user is allowed to perform the request.
Use roles to customize workflow, capabilities to enforce it
A good architecture may therefore look like:
Role targeting:
Decide who sees the button.
Capability check:
Decide who can execute the action.
Both layers can usefully coexist.
Role targeting and WordPress multisite
WordPress multisite complicates roles because users can belong to several sites in the network with different permissions on each one.
For example:
User ID 42
Site A:
Administrator
Site B:
Editor
Site C:
No membership
A role-based action should therefore understand which site’s context it is evaluating.
Do not assume one user’s role is globally identical across a network
In multisite, roles and capabilities are site-specific in important ways.
An Administrator on one site does not automatically have the equivalent role on every other site.
Network-level Super Administrator access adds another layer beyond normal site roles.
Super Admin is not simply another ordinary site role
On multisite installations, Super Admin privileges should be treated separately from standard site role checks.
For operations involving network-level permissions, use WordPress capability APIs designed for the relevant action rather than trying to infer everything from a role array.
Targeting users should happen at send time or evaluation time deliberately
Suppose an Editor notification is created Monday.
On Tuesday, one user changes from:
Editor
→ Subscriber
Should that user still see Monday’s notification?
There are two models.
Resolve recipients when the notification is sent
Monday:
Find all Editors
Store each recipient
Send notification
The recipient keeps the message even if their role changes later.
Evaluate the role whenever the notification is displayed
Every page load:
Is this user still an Editor?
If yes, show message
The message may disappear when the role changes.
Neither model is universally correct.
The system should deliberately choose one.
For sent communications, resolving recipients is often clearer
If a notification represents an actual message that was sent at a point in time, storing recipient state gives you a historical fact:
This user received this message.
That can support:
- read tracking;
- delivery logs;
- message retraction;
- auditing;
- recipient counts.
TheOneWP Notifications Generator resolves targeted recipients
Notifications Generator creates recipient-specific in-app notification state and maintains a sent log with per-recipient read information.
This means the system can distinguish:
Target audience
Recipients generated
Recipients who actually read the message
rather than simply asking which roles currently exist every time the panel opens.
Batch large role-targeted sends
If you send an in-app notification to:
10 Editors
the operation is trivial.
If you target:
200,000 Subscribers
creating all recipient records during one browser request may cause:
- timeouts;
- memory pressure;
- database load;
- partially completed operations.
Large audience systems should process recipients in batches.
Do not repeatedly query role membership when it can be cached or resolved once
Suppose every page request executes:
Find all users with role Editor
just to determine whether the current logged-in user is an Editor.
That would be absurdly expensive compared with simply inspecting the current user’s own roles or capabilities.
Choose the query according to the actual question.
Current user vs. audience query
These are different problems:
Does current user match Editor?
→ inspect current user
Who are all Editors?
→ get_users() / WP_User_Query
Do not fetch the population to answer a question about one person.
Do not run user queries before WordPress is ready
The current WordPress implementation warns against running WP_User_Query before the plugins_loaded hook.
This matters because plugins can modify user roles and query behavior during initialization.
Run targeting logic at an appropriate point in the WordPress lifecycle rather than during arbitrary file inclusion.
Do not query by display name to determine permission
This should be obvious, but humanity has persisted through less promising architectural decisions.
Never implement:
If username = "admin"
→ treat as Administrator
or:
If display name contains "Editor"
→ editor access
Use WordPress roles and capabilities.
Role changes should take effect predictably
When an Administrator changes a user’s role, affected systems should have clear behavior.
For example:
- new login redirects should use the new role;
- future targeted notifications should use the new role;
- role-specific notices should change;
- security requirements may change;
- capabilities should reflect the updated assignment.
Historical messages already sent may reasonably remain.
Be careful when removing roles
If a plugin defines:
project_manager
and you remove that role while users are still assigned to it, workflows relying on that audience can break.
Before deleting or replacing custom roles:
- identify assigned users;
- choose replacement roles;
- review capabilities;
- review notification rules;
- review login redirects;
- review security policies.
Role names should describe responsibility
Useful custom role names include:
Content Reviewer
Store Manager
Support Agent
Project Manager
Less useful:
Role 2
Special User
Advanced Account
Blue Group
A clear role architecture improves targeting because administrators can understand the audience without reverse-engineering what “CustomRole_7” was intended to mean three agencies ago.
Do not give roles extra capabilities merely to make targeting easier
Suppose you want a group called:
Newsletter Editors
Do not grant:
manage_options
just because some plugin requires that capability to expose a feature.
Design role permissions according to least privilege.
If targeting requires additional segmentation, create that separately.
Least privilege makes role targeting more meaningful
If every internal role gradually receives:
manage_options
because it solves assorted plugin access problems, the distinction between roles becomes increasingly meaningless.
A useful role architecture should make permission boundaries intentional.
Role targeting can support staged rollouts
Suppose a new workflow needs testing.
You could enable it first for:
Administrators
then:
Editors
and finally:
Authors
This provides a straightforward rollout model without enabling the feature for every account simultaneously.
Role targeting is not feature-flagging by itself
A proper feature flag may also need:
- percent-based rollout;
- individual overrides;
- environment rules;
- temporary activation;
- experiment groups.
Roles are useful audience attributes, but they should not become the only segmentation mechanism in a complex application.
Test custom role targeting with real accounts
Do not test everything while logged in as Administrator.
Create representative test accounts:
Administrator test account
Editor test account
Author test account
Subscriber test account
Custom role test account
Then verify:
- which messages each receives;
- which notices each sees;
- where each role lands after login;
- which menus are visible;
- which actions are actually permitted.
Test multiple-role users separately
If your system supports multiple roles, include combinations such as:
Editor + SEO Manager
Subscriber + Customer
Administrator + Custom Role
These are where simplistic:
$user->roles[0]
logic tends to demonstrate its artistic interpretation of authorization.
Keep targeting logic centralized
If one plugin checks:
Administrator OR Editor
another checks:
manage_options
and a third manually inspects serialized wp_capabilities, behavior becomes difficult to understand.
Where possible, centralize reusable audience logic and use WordPress APIs consistently.
Do not query wp_usermeta directly unless you need to
Role information is represented through WordPress user metadata internally, but application code should normally use:
WP_User;get_users();WP_User_Query;current_user_can().
rather than building SQL against capability meta values.
For the underlying storage system, see WordPress user meta, explained.
Why direct role SQL is fragile
A manual query might try to search serialized values in:
wp_usermeta
for something resembling:
"editor"
This is fragile because:
- role data is serialized;
- table prefixes vary;
- multisite prefixes differ;
- plugins can extend role handling;
- WordPress already provides a supported query abstraction.
Use WordPress APIs unless profiling proves they are insufficient
There are legitimate high-scale cases where custom querying or specialized data structures may be justified.
But start with the supported API.
Do not optimize around imaginary performance problems by replacing maintainable code with serialized-string archaeology.
A practical role-targeting decision tree
What are you trying to decide?
│
├── Can the current user perform an action?
│ │
│ └── Check capability
│
├── Does this current user belong to a group?
│ │
│ └── Check their roles
│
├── Find every user in one role?
│ │
│ └── get_users() / WP_User_Query
│
├── Find users in any of several roles?
│ │
│ └── role__in
│
├── Exclude certain roles?
│ │
│ └── role__not_in
│
├── Find users with stored capability membership?
│ │
│ └── capability / capability__in
│
└── Segment users by non-permission property?
│
└── Consider user meta or another
audience model
Example: send a notification to Editors
Conceptually:
$editor_ids = get_users(
[
'role' => 'editor',
'fields' => 'ID',
]
);
foreach ( $editor_ids as $user_id ) {
// Create notification for recipient.
}
On large sites, batch the operation rather than attempting to process the full result set in one request.
Example: target Administrators or Editors
$user_ids = get_users(
[
'role__in' => [
'administrator',
'editor',
],
'fields' => 'ID',
]
);
This is appropriate when membership in either audience should qualify.
Example: protect an administrative action
Do not write:
if (
in_array(
'administrator',
$user->roles,
true
)
) {
run_sensitive_operation();
}
Prefer the capability required by the operation:
if (
current_user_can(
'manage_options'
)
) {
run_sensitive_operation();
}
The capability name should correspond to the actual action being protected.
Example: combine role and user preference
Suppose only Editors who opted into beta announcements should receive a message.
The model could be:
Role:
editor
User meta:
beta_notifications = 1
You can then build a narrower audience instead of creating an artificial:
Beta Editor
security role.
Common WordPress role-targeting mistakes
Using role checks for every permission decision
Check capabilities when authorization is what matters.
Assuming every user has exactly one role
Plugins and custom workflows can assign several.
Only checking the first role
You may miss legitimate audience matches.
Using role display names instead of slugs
Internal targeting should use stable identifiers.
Creating roles merely as marketing segments
Use user metadata or another segmentation model for non-permission attributes.
Giving users extra privileges just to fit them into a target role
Audience segmentation should never weaken access control.
Sending every notice to every role
Irrelevant information creates notification fatigue.
Fetching every user when only IDs are required
Request the smallest useful result set.
Loading hundreds of thousands of users in one request
Batch large audiences.
Querying all role members to determine the current user’s role
Inspect the current user directly.
Assuming hidden menus provide security
Protected operations still need capability checks.
Ignoring role conflicts in post-login redirects
Multiple matching roles need deterministic priority.
Forgetting multisite context
The same user can have different roles on different sites.
Editing serialized capability user meta directly
Use WordPress role and user APIs where possible.
WordPress role-targeting checklist
- Define exactly why the audience is being segmented.
- Use roles when group membership matters.
- Use capabilities when permission matters.
- Use user metadata for attributes that are not permissions.
- Use role slugs rather than display labels.
- Check all assigned roles when multiple roles are supported.
- Use
get_users()orWP_User_Queryfor audience queries. - Use
role__infor OR-based multi-role targeting. - Use
role__not_inwhen excluding audiences. - Request only user IDs when complete user objects are unnecessary.
- Batch large recipient sets.
- Use
current_user_can()for authorization checks. - Do not treat hidden UI as access control.
- Plan precedence when several roles can match competing rules.
- Test custom roles.
- Test multiple-role accounts.
- Consider multisite context.
- Keep role architecture understandable.
- Follow least privilege when assigning capabilities.
- Remove irrelevant notifications instead of rewriting everything for everyone.
- Review role-based rules when roles are renamed or deleted.
- Test role changes against notification, login and security workflows.
Related WordPress user targeting and access guides
For the wider WordPress roles, notifications and access-control cluster, continue with:
- WordPress user roles and capabilities, explained
- WordPress user meta, explained
- Writing effective in-app notification copy
- In-app notifications vs. email for WordPress
- WordPress admin notices, explained
- Decluttering the WordPress admin dashboard
- Notifications Generator
- Notifications Off-Canvas
- Multi Role Assignment
- Role Manager
- Redirect After Login
- Disable Admin Notifications by Role
- Two-Factor Authentication
Final thoughts
Targeting WordPress users by role is most useful when the role represents a genuine audience: Editors who need an editorial announcement, Administrators who require stronger authentication or Subscribers who should follow a different post-login workflow.
The important part is not to confuse that convenience with authorization itself.
Roles describe groups. Capabilities describe permissions. User metadata can describe additional account attributes. Choosing the right one keeps the user model understandable instead of gradually turning every business rule into another inexplicable WordPress role.
TheOneWP Notifications Generator uses role-aware targeting to send relevant in-app messages, Multi Role Assignment extends accounts with additional roles, Role Manager controls the role architecture itself and Redirect After Login applies the same audience concept to authentication workflows.
For security-sensitive operations, however, ask whether the user has the required capability instead of merely asking what badge their account happens to wear.
That distinction sounds small until someone creates a custom role with Administrator-level permissions and your code confidently announces that everything is safe because the word “Administrator” is nowhere to be found.

